Hello Till,
Is there any “evidence” of what could be happening either in /var/log/messages
(or syslog), dmesg ?
Any way you can strace the dhcpd process and see if you can find something ?
Is the PacketFence server in production or only in tests ? Any large network(s)
provisionned by the PacketFence dhcpd service ? (registration, isolation)
Any “evident” errors / warnings in the packetfence.log ?
What is the result of select count(ip) from iplog_history on the PacketFence
database ?
Cheers!
-dw.
—
Derek Wuelfrath
dwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110)
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(www.packetfence.org)
> On Apr 25, 2016, at 14:51, Till Wimmer <t.wim...@tonarchiv.ch> wrote:
>
> Hello Derek,
>
> sadly, it was not the timezone setting. After runing for almost a day,
> the problem did come back. Average sytem load is 1.34, Dhcpd is running
> 100% of one CPU.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On 04/25/2016 03:17 PM, Derek Wuelfrath wrote:
>> Hello Till,
>>
>>> But meanwhile I think that I have found the real reason: The timezone in
>>> PF was set wrong.
>>> So maybe there was some confusion with the lease times because of this.
>>> Now, after setting it right, the lease file also looks fine to me.
>> Have you reenable OMAPI after changing the timezone ? :)
>>
>> It seems a bit strange to me since [general.timezone] PacketFence
>> configuration parameter is not really used in “that workflow”.
>>
>> Cheers!
>> -dw.
>>
>> —
>> Derek Wuelfrath
>> dwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110)
>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
>> (www.packetfence.org)
>>
>>> On Apr 25, 2016, at 05:16, g4-l...@tonarchiv.ch wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi MJ,
>>>
>>> yes, diasbling OMAPI solved the issue...
>>>
>>> But meanwhile I think that I have found the real reason: The timezone in
>>> PF was set wrong.
>>> So maybe there was some confusion with the lease times because of this.
>>> Now, after setting it right, the lease file also looks fine to me.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Till
>>>
>>> On 04/24/2016 10:41 PM, mj wrote:
>>>> try disabling omapi for dhcp.
>>>>
>>>> MJ
>>>>
>>>> On 04/24/2016 08:12 PM, g4-l...@tonarchiv.ch wrote:
>>>>> Hi there!
>>>>>
>>>>> I set up a PF 6 in inline configuration for testing on Debian 7.
>>>>> There is nothing going on on the WLAN - no registered nodes yet.
>>>>> But after a few hours dhcpd took 100% of one CPU. After restarting dhcpd
>>>>> the load went back to normal. Then, a few hours later, the same story...
>>>>>
>>>>> I had a look in the leases file... and there something looks strange to
>>>>> me. There are overlapping leases:
>>>>>
>>>>> lease 192.168.3.10 {
>>>>> starts 0 2016/04/24 17:26:23;
>>>>> ends 1 2016/04/25 17:26:23;
>>>>> cltt 0 2016/04/24 17:26:23;
>>>>> binding state active;
>>>>> next binding state free;
>>>>> rewind binding state free;
>>>>> hardware ethernet e0:f8:47:aa:bb:cc;
>>>>> uid "\001\340\370G\212\0112";
>>>>> client-hostname "iPhone";
>>>>> }
>>>>> server-duid "\000\001\000\001\036\254\321$\010\000'\377ds";
>>>>>
>>>>> lease 192.168.3.10 {
>>>>> starts 0 2016/04/24 17:41:23;
>>>>> ends 1 2016/04/25 17:41:23;
>>>>> cltt 0 2016/04/24 17:41:23;
>>>>> binding state active;
>>>>> next binding state free;
>>>>> rewind binding state free;
>>>>> hardware ethernet e0:f8:47:aa:bb:cc;
>>>>> uid "\001\340\370G\212\0112";
>>>>> client-hostname "iPhone";
>>>>> }
>>>>> lease 192.168.3.10 {
>>>>> starts 0 2016/04/24 17:56:19;
>>>>> ends 1 2016/04/25 17:56:19;
>>>>> cltt 0 2016/04/24 17:56:19;
>>>>> binding state active;
>>>>> next binding state free;
>>>>> rewind binding state free;
>>>>> hardware ethernet e0:f8:47:aa:bb:cc;
>>>>> uid "\001\340\370G\212\0112";
>>>>> client-hostname "iPhone";
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there maybe a bug in the PF OMAPI part?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Till
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
> Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
> your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
> reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
