-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Il 29/07/2016 03:14, Sallee, Jake ha scritto:
> Eloge:
>
> I have been running PF in production for years with a very similar
> setup to the one you have described.
I Jake,
I was tempted to answer myself with a "yes, it's possible. Definitely"
but then I re-read this sentence, in the original POST from Eloge:
- -------------
> [...] We have an hybrid network with WIFI and Wired connection with at
> some points CASCADED SWITCHES WITH MANAGED AND UNMANAGED EQUIPMENTS.
> [...]
- -------------
(caps added by me)
As in my network environment there are "unmanaged" switches as well
(...unfortunately!), I believed that this is a definitely NO-NO for a
VLAN deployment of PF.
Am I wrong?
Thanks,
DV
- --
Damiano Verzulli
e-mail: dami...@verzulli.it
- ---
possible?ok:while(!possible){open_mindedness++}
- ---
"Technical people tend to fall into two categories: Specialists
and Generalists. The Specialist learns more and more about a
narrower and narrower field, until he eventually, in the limit,
knows everything about nothing. The Generalist learns less and
less about a wider and wider field, until eventually he knows
nothing about everything." - William Stucke - AfrISPA
http://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/pubsoft/2007-December/001935.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlebNPcACgkQcwT9fsMT4Sy0qgCgodr+4gYxqZNE7H9MZBFxpaTA
KcgAoKEAcpQleWLMS5Z7rIPqMSBfX+8h
=fZhk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
