Update: I have compared the output from running vdpauinfo in the following situations:
1. original Mesa packages from TW
2. original Mesa packages from PMBS without the patch
3. Mesa packages from PMBS with the patch applied in my home
repository on PMBS
The result on my Intel based systems is that there is *no* difference. I
therefore suggested to revoke the patch. If you think there might be a
difference on an AMD/Nvidia based graphics stack, feel free to test with
it.
Sorry for the noise!
Cheers.
l8er
manfred
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023, 15:24:15 +0100, Manfred Hollstein wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2023, 10:45:02 +0100, Manfred Hollstein wrote:
> > [...]
> > On Tue, 24 Jan 2023, 09:16:24 +0100, Masaru Nomiya wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > This has nothing to do with the video codec problem, but Steven
> > > didn't say he couldn't compile Mesa-drivers, so .... (_ _?
> >
> > This is effectively needed to fix Mesa.spec:
> >
> > %if "%{flavor}" == "drivers"
> > %if %{video_codecs}
> > BuildRequires: pkgconfig(x264)
> > BuildRequires: pkgconfig(x265)
> > %endif
> > %endif
> >
> > I'll try to get that pushed into openSUSE.org:X11:Xorg/Mesa, which would
> > then fix our Essentials/A_tw-Mesa package.
>
> my request has just been accepted and forwarded to openSUSE:Factory
>
> <https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1060658>
>
> I'll track that and send an update once it's in Factory!
>
> Cheers.
>
> l8er
> manfred
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
