On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Nagy Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think that _alpm_find_first_satisfier implementation is a bit
> complicated... I would prefer just ~reimplement
> _alpm_find_dep_satisfiers instead of calling it (and introducing a new
> "wrapper").
>

I don't understand what you mean here, but feel free to take that
patch, and rework it as you wish, then re-submit it on the ML.

_______________________________________________
pacman-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev

Reply via email to