> Maybe you can just drop this behavior for now, because this is indeed > inconsistent with resolvedeps. Then if we want to reintroduce some > kind of handling of multiple satisfiers in the future, it should be > done for both explicit targets (which is currently done in frontend) > and dependency resolving (in backend). >
I've just found the following: '/' handling is done in backend (sync_addtarget), so pacman -S db/sh won't do the expected operation, because the provision handling is done in front-end. Is this OK? Bye _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
