On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You do realize you just broke openssh version numbering > > Here is my vote for the best order: > 1.0alpha < 1.0beta < 1.0pre < 1.0rc < 1.0 < 1.0a < 1.0b < 1.0c >
I think I just restored the old behavior, what we had before is : 1.0a < 1.0alpha < 1.0b < 1.0beta < 1.0c < 1.0pre < 1.0rc < 1.0 And as far as I can see, it never caused problems to openssh. Both old and new behaviors worked fine with it, because we always had : 4.3p1 < 4.3p2 < 4.4p1 According to the cvs history : http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/core/support/openssh/PKGBUILD?root=core&view=log and the source archives : ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/OpenSSH/portable/ the scheme was always X.Y[.Z]pN . Now, maybe 1.0alpha < 1.0beta < 1.0pre < 1.0rc < 1.0 < 1.0a < 1.0b < 1.0c would be better, but we never had this behavior, and implementing would be (much?) more complex than what we have now. _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
