2008/7/17 Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Xavier wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> You do realize you just broke openssh version numbering >>> >>> Here is my vote for the best order: >>> 1.0alpha < 1.0beta < 1.0pre < 1.0rc < 1.0 < 1.0a < 1.0b < 1.0c
This is possible only with hardcoding the order, but that's overkill IMO. >> >> I think I just restored the old behavior, what we had before is : >> 1.0a < 1.0alpha < 1.0b < 1.0beta < 1.0c < 1.0pre < 1.0rc < 1.0 >> Great! The most important point was that 1.0 was > than 1.0anything, and new behavior changed this (which I didn't like because of unneeded breakage of packages) So restoring to the old behavior is good. > Yeah, poor example... In the v1.2ish era they went 1.2 -> 12.p2 -> > 1.2p3 but that was a while ago... > > A better example is samba :) samba used to have options=('force') so restoring to old behavior breaks nothing. Summary: [+] for restored old behavior, [-] for idea of hardcoding the order of version postfixes. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич) _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list pacman-dev@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev