Dan McGee wrote: > > And if we want to toss some fireworks around, reverting this commit > would fix 004 as well (at the expense of 003). :P > > commit a71f4c4c6a7775503b29ab856f8a5ce2801f2967 > Author: Chantry Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun Jan 6 10:59:41 2008 +0100 > > conflict.c : fix for FS#8156, detect conflict between symlink and dir. >
Indeed, that is what I said in the beginning, it seemed logical to me that this patch fixed fileconflict003 and broke fileconflict004, but it did not back then, because that strange code you removed was still there. So removing it was not a bad thing since it makes the code clearer and the behavior of my patch predictable. Anyway, I think it is always important to understand what happened, but it doesn't always help getting things fixed. _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
