On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 7:30 AM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Nagy Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> My opinion about fileconflict check, that it is really fast, but it has >> some bugs (most important: trans001.py). I think we should decide if we >> want to implement FS#8585 *soon* or not, that would solve most of these >> issues. If we want, I don't think we should waste too much effort to >> this to-be-removed fileconflict check part. >> > > I share your opinion. But I can't make that decision.
I think we should just put some jury-rigged, hopefully passes both 003 and 004 code in here and really attempt to fix this on the larger scale post-3.2. Xavier, would a revert of my "useless check" patch solve the problem for now? -Dan _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
