On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bryan Ischo wrote:
>>>>
>>>> @@ -371,7 +371,8 @@ typedef enum _pmtransconv_t {
>>>>    PM_TRANS_CONV_REPLACE_PKG = 0x02,
>>>>    PM_TRANS_CONV_CONFLICT_PKG = 0x04,
>>>>    PM_TRANS_CONV_CORRUPTED_PKG = 0x08,
>>>> -    PM_TRANS_CONV_LOCAL_NEWER = 0x10
>>>> +    PM_TRANS_CONV_LOCAL_NEWER = 0x10,
>>>> +    PM_TRANS_CONV_REMOVE_PKGS = 0x20,
>>>> } pmtransconv_t;
>
> Is that new dangling comma at the end there a bad thing?
>

A quick lookup on google tells me this is valid in C99 but not in C89 standard.
_______________________________________________
pacman-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev

Reply via email to