Xavier wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote:
Bryan Ischo wrote:
@@ -371,7 +371,8 @@ typedef enum _pmtransconv_t {
PM_TRANS_CONV_REPLACE_PKG = 0x02,
PM_TRANS_CONV_CONFLICT_PKG = 0x04,
PM_TRANS_CONV_CORRUPTED_PKG = 0x08,
- PM_TRANS_CONV_LOCAL_NEWER = 0x10
+ PM_TRANS_CONV_LOCAL_NEWER = 0x10,
+ PM_TRANS_CONV_REMOVE_PKGS = 0x20,
} pmtransconv_t;
Is that new dangling comma at the end there a bad thing?
A quick lookup on google tells me this is valid in C99 but not in C89 standard.
It was unintentional. If I recreate my patches I will fix it. If not,
whoever applies my patches, can you please just fix that yourself in
your tree? Or don't fix it - there isn't a compiler made in 10 years
that would have problems with that comma ....
Bryan
_______________________________________________
pacman-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
