On 17/05/10 23:35, Nezmer wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 09:29:30PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 11/05/10 05:30, Nezmer wrote:
This change makes sense for me in general. The use-case I ran into was
needing the dependencies when repackaging.

Signed-off-by: Nezmer<[email protected]>
---
  scripts/makepkg.sh.in |    2 +-
  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in b/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
index a2db90b..34261b5 100644
--- a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
+++ b/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
@@ -1867,7 +1867,7 @@ if (( SOURCEONLY )); then
  fi

  # fix flyspray bug #5973
-if (( NODEPS || NOBUILD || REPKG )); then
+if (( (NODEPS || NOBUILD || REPKG)&&   ! DEP_BIN )); then
        # no warning message needed for nobuild, repkg
        if (( NODEPS )); then
                warning "$(gettext "Skipping dependency checks.")"


I think I would prefer something like:

if (( NODEPS || ( ( NOBUILD || REPKG )&&  !DEP_BIN ) )); then

For NODEPS, we can safely skip installing deps if someone uses
"--nodeps --syncdeps" because that person is an idiot!

There is no way to figure out what the (idiot) wants to exactly
accomplish, "--nodeps" or "--syncdeps". So If you feel "--nodeps"
carries more weight, then obviously your line should be used.


I think REPKG should only installed deps when explicitly asked as a
fair portion of the time installing deps will be unneeded.

Fairly asked by passing "--syncdeps" ?!


Finally, I am not sure whether "--nobuild --syncdeps" is an OK
combination.  I think it is.

Of course It is.

Jemmy has no internet at home. He really needs to build a package. He
has to go to the Starbucks down the street in less than half an hour to
fetch dist files and dependencies and go back before the battery dies.

$ PACMAN="pacman --noconfirm" makepkg -so  # and run!


Sound fine?

Yes.

We are discussing a one-liner here. Should I copy off your line and resubmit ?


Sure.  It maybe should also change:

>>>    if (( NODEPS )); then
>>>            warning "$(gettext "Skipping dependency checks.")"

to
if (( NODEPS || REPKG )); then

as a warning is probably a good thing in the REPKG case now.

Allan

Reply via email to