On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Ray Kohler <ataraxia...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Allan McRae <al...@archlinux.org> wrote: >> Here is a list I made to help keep track of the status of issues in the >> 3.5.0 release that I thought may be on use to others.... >> >> >> Fixed: >> >> (No FS#) - reading from stdin and piping "yes" >> - Fix in git Fix pushed.
>> FS#23307 - [makepkg] unexpected EOF error when parenthesis are used in >> optdepends description >> - Fix attached to bug report (on Allan's working branch) Fix pushed. >> FS#23314 - [pacman] segfault when a database includes deltas >> - Fix attached to bug report (Dan to clean up) Fix pushed. >> FS#23315 - Makepkg gives fatal error if locale isn't set to en_US.utf8 >> - Fix identified in bug report. Requires adjustment to translation Fix pushed to Transifex. >> FS#23325 - libalpm links to many libraries >> - "Fix" to workaround libtool bug on mailing list Fix pushed. Ignore my other false alarm emails, if you start with an actual clean build things seem fine. >> FS#23342 - --ignore'ing a package given in the arg list >> - Fix on mailing list (on Allan's working branch) Fix pushed. >> FS#23343 - Pacman does not set world readable permissions on db files (obeys >> umask instead) >> - Fix attached to bug report (on Allan's working branch) Fix pushed. >> Bug remaining to be fixed: >> >> FS#23340 - Group selection mechanism and -Sp >> - is this a case of excess output, or should the selection of packages be >> able to be performed with -Sp? I guess the former given the -Sp is intended >> to be used in scripts? >> >> FS#23322 - zsh autocompletion no longer works with pacman 3.5 >> - The zsh autocompletion file has not been updated in a while. >> Do we have a zsh user that wants to tackle this? >> >> (No FS#) - pacman -{S,U,R} --help does not show -p (only --print) >> - Was this deliberate to keep it beside the --print-format line? > > How about: > > - usage message does not show "-T" (this is not a new bug, actually) > > - difference in handling "-v" and "--debug", if this is even really to > be called a bug at all ( > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2011-March/012693.html) > > I don't see FS open for either of these. I'll do so if you want. Yes please, although these aren't terribly important enough to warrant holding up a maint release. -Dan