On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Dan McGee <dpmc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Ray Kohler <ataraxia...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Allan McRae <al...@archlinux.org> wrote: >>> Here is a list I made to help keep track of the status of issues in the >>> 3.5.0 release that I thought may be on use to others.... >>> >>> >>> Fixed: >>> >>> (No FS#) - reading from stdin and piping "yes" >>> - Fix in git > Fix pushed. > >>> FS#23307 - [makepkg] unexpected EOF error when parenthesis are used in >>> optdepends description >>> - Fix attached to bug report (on Allan's working branch) > Fix pushed. > >>> FS#23314 - [pacman] segfault when a database includes deltas >>> - Fix attached to bug report (Dan to clean up) > Fix pushed. > >>> FS#23315 - Makepkg gives fatal error if locale isn't set to en_US.utf8 >>> - Fix identified in bug report. Requires adjustment to translation > Fix pushed to Transifex. > >>> FS#23325 - libalpm links to many libraries >>> - "Fix" to workaround libtool bug on mailing list > Fix pushed. Ignore my other false alarm emails, if you start with an > actual clean build things seem fine. > >>> FS#23342 - --ignore'ing a package given in the arg list >>> - Fix on mailing list (on Allan's working branch) > Fix pushed. > >>> FS#23343 - Pacman does not set world readable permissions on db files (obeys >>> umask instead) >>> - Fix attached to bug report (on Allan's working branch) > Fix pushed. > >>> Bug remaining to be fixed: >>> >>> FS#23340 - Group selection mechanism and -Sp >>> - is this a case of excess output, or should the selection of packages be >>> able to be performed with -Sp? I guess the former given the -Sp is intended >>> to be used in scripts? >>> >>> FS#23322 - zsh autocompletion no longer works with pacman 3.5 >>> - The zsh autocompletion file has not been updated in a while. >>> Do we have a zsh user that wants to tackle this? >>> >>> (No FS#) - pacman -{S,U,R} --help does not show -p (only --print) >>> - Was this deliberate to keep it beside the --print-format line? >> >> How about: >> >> - usage message does not show "-T" (this is not a new bug, actually)
This is now FS #23369. >> - difference in handling "-v" and "--debug", if this is even really to >> be called a bug at all ( >> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2011-March/012693.html) This is now FS #23370. >> I don't see FS open for either of these. I'll do so if you want. > Yes please, although these aren't terribly important enough to warrant > holding up a maint release.