On 18/04/16 16:08, Allan McRae wrote: > On 28/03/16 10:54, [email protected] wrote: >> From: Xavion <Xavion (dot) 0 (at) Gmail (dot) com> >> >> Specifically, the following changes have been made: >> * The repository is in 'magenta' >> * The package name is in 'bold' >> * The version is in 'green' >> >> Signed-off-by: Xavion <Xavion (dot) 0 (at) Gmail (dot) com> >> --- >> src/pacman/files.c | 6 ++++-- >> src/pacman/query.c | 5 +++-- >> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/src/pacman/files.c b/src/pacman/files.c >> index 5240c07..692fcd5 100644 >> --- a/src/pacman/files.c >> +++ b/src/pacman/files.c >> @@ -77,8 +77,10 @@ static int files_fileowner(alpm_list_t *syncs, >> alpm_list_t *targets) { >> if(config->op_f_machinereadable) { >> >> print_line_machinereadable(repo, pkg, filename); >> } else if(!config->quiet) { >> - printf(_("%s is owned by %s/%s >> %s\n"), filename, >> - >> alpm_db_get_name(repo), alpm_pkg_get_name(pkg), >> + const colstr_t *colstr = >> &config->colstr; >> + printf(_("%s is owned by >> %s%s/%s%s %s%s\n"), filename, >> + colstr->repo, >> alpm_db_get_name(repo), colstr->title, >> + >> alpm_pkg_get_name(pkg), colstr->version, >> >> alpm_pkg_get_version(pkg)); > > Should the '/' between the repo and package names be magenta? >
Replying to myself... it is for -Ss and -Qs. A
