On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Andrew Gregory <andrew.gregor...@gmail.com> wrote: > You seem to think that more color is so obviously better than less > color that you don't need to justify its inclusion. It's not. If you > really want all this color in pacman's output you need to start giving > us reasons beyond just "I want it" or "I find it more readable". > I believe Allan and I are in total agreement here: color is most
Urm, to just add my two cents here, but I'm assuming xavion has grown used to the former pacman-color. As someone who is regularly annoyed the fuck out of by things that change outside of my control and as I'm not really over the no longer so recent coreutils ls(1) change, seriously. We're geeks and we know where we want moving parts, and sometimes we just need something that stays the same even across project boundaries and/or merges, if I'm reading this correctly. If this justification doesn't count, take this as a call decision, because I don't think there's any party with any other more relevant argument. cheers! mar77i
