> these things should not cost money. Sorry, but companies do _have_ to make money to pay my salary. > maybe 3COM should write a development environment themselves.. they > should put their time and effort into it - it is their product which > will be promoted. Didn't 3COM buy MW a few months back? > if metroworks charges for 'updates'.. it is very disencouraging for > people to buy it. of course there will be bugs.. but once you buy > one - surely updates should come free.. I bought CW R3 a couple years back. They upgraged me to R4 then R5 for free. > some companies are just too greedy? some people want everything for free.:) But, I do think that they need to have updates more often. just my 2c. Todd
- Re: gcc vs anything else Marc Balmer
- Re: gcc vs anything else Aaron Ardiri
- Re: gcc vs anything else Aaron Ardiri
- RE: gcc vs anything else Fawcett, Mitch
- RE: gcc vs anything else Aaron Ardiri
- RE: gcc vs anything else Fawcett, Mitch
- RE: gcc vs anything else Aaron Ardiri
- RE: gcc vs anything else Bryan Nystrom
- RE: gcc vs anything else Aaron Ardiri
- Re: gcc vs anything else Michael S. Davis
- Re: gcc vs anything else Todd Christensen
- Re: gcc vs anything else Tom Zerucha
- Re: gcc vs anything else Michael Obenland
- Re: gcc vs anything else Eric Cloninger
- Re: gcc vs anything else Ralf Beckers
- Re: gcc vs anything else Nathan J. Williams
- Re: gcc vs anything else Kenneth Albanowski
- Re: gcc vs anything else Nathan J. Williams
- Re: gcc vs anything else Chris Antos
- Re: gcc vs anything else Kenneth Albanowski
- Re: gcc vs anything else Aaron Ardiri
