John Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >There's certainly no compelling argument for using "Int16" etc >instead of "int" etc,
There is if you have code that also needs to compile on Windows CE. >but there are compelling technical arguments for using >"int" etc instead of "Int16" etc in many circumstances. I've never heard a compelling technical argument for C's primitive types having no specified size. -- For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/
