> > maybe it is in the spec of a font family that it requires the lo-res > > font? ever thought about that? i am sure the check wouldn't be put there > > unless there was a reason to put it there. > > Then why is it possible with PalmSource's own Constructor to create > extended font resources with a single member? (See the example of "Teeny > tiny fonts" in the Knowledgebase.)
good question - i believe the discussions that have been had on the pilrc-developer mail list about this. i am not sure why this restriction is there (someone brought it up tho). if it could be clarified, we can easily fix it. its also like the 384 string limit within a stringlist - not sure why that limit is coded in there either. > And please, why do you always feel personally offended if anybody says > anything about Pilrc? This is really annoying. The next thing you are > going to say is probably "fix it yourself". Hey, I did not mean to > offend the Pilrc team. You are doing great work! I am only trying to > find a solution to my problem. but, you can fix it yourself. download the source, edit those lines of code and recompile. then, you can submit the change to the pilrc-developer mailing list and ask if it should be there or not - because, there can be bugs in our code as well. instead of being a user, how about being a contributor? if you could find a few references as to why it should be ok for having a single density font in the font family, please do find them and bring them to our attention :) it is definately something that needs clarification - unfortunately not all of us have the luxury of being able to clear things up due to other work commitments. --- Aaron Ardiri PalmOS Certified Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mobilewizardry.com/members/aaron_ardiri.php -- For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/
