On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:31 AM, walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:15:26 +0000, Keith Richie wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 8:06 PM, walt > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:49:04 +0000, Keith Richie wrote: > >> > >> > I'm using 0.132 from CVS with the image and nzb patch included. > >> > >> Hi Keith, > >> > >> Afraid I can't fix the bug for you, but I'm curious which patches you > >> refer to. > > > > > There were patches commited and merged to svn that fixed the jpeg/image > > display error. Where sometimes images would only display the first part. > > Yes, I know that bug very well but AFAIK the patches were applied only by > some binary distributors and not committed to svn. Anyone know for sure? > (That patch is no longer needed, BTW.)
It's no longer needed because it was merged into svn. As I posted above ;) I'm using 0.132 from CVS with the image and nzb patch included. ^^ Stated the patches were included. But I guess someone could interpret that as me saying I patched it myself. > > > > In this list, there are discussions about it. I believe it was to do > > with a gdk-pixbuf and GMime error... > > Yes, that was a gdk-pixbuf bug that was fixed somewhere between gtk2 > 2.12.5 and 2.12.6. Anyone running gtk2 later than that should be okay. > > > > The nzb patch fixed loading some nzb's that were out of order. > > Somehow I missed that one, thanks. > > > > Here's the info from the changelog > > > > 447680 handle nzb files whose parts are in the wrong order (Benjamin > > Charron) 426377 workaround for GMime bug that won't show multipart > > images (Mike) > > > > > > Duncan nailed the issue, as expected ---- Thank You!!! > > Of course. That's why I didn't try to answer your question :o) > > > > It was indeed unusual characters in the subject. > > No polished app should be confused by unexpected user input -- that's > how many security exploits do their dirty work. If you can show us the > guilty character string perhaps it can be fixed. Or a bug filed at the > very least. > > > > I went ahead and queued > > up quite a few binaries, made a tasks.nzb file 18mb large. Pan had no > > problems reloading. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pan-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users > I'll have to look for some posts again that cause this issue. Give me a day or two to find it. _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
