On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:40:36 +0000, Keith Richie wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:31 AM, walt > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:15:26 +0000, Keith Richie wrote: >> > There were patches commited and merged to svn that fixed the >> > jpeg/image >> > display error. Where sometimes images would only display the first >> > part.
>> Yes, I know that bug very well but AFAIK the patches were applied only >> by some binary distributors and not committed to svn. Anyone know for >> sure? (That patch is no longer needed, BTW.) > It's no longer needed because it was merged into svn. As I posted above > ;) Ah, we're discussing two different patches for two different bugs. I forgot that this multi-part jpeg problem showed up twice for different reasons. This is the patch that never was committed and is now no longer needed: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=96917 > I'm using 0.132 from CVS with the image and nzb patch included. > > ^^ Stated the patches were included. But I guess someone could interpret > that as me saying I patched it myself. Indeed, pan cvs includes every patch that has ever been committed, so any mention of patches I take to mean *un*committed patches. Very logical :o) _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
