On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 3:53 AM, Gonéri Le Bouder via RT <bug-par-pac...@rt.cpan.org> wrote: > Fri Jan 23 21:53:57 2009: Request 42731 was acted upon. > Transaction: Correspondence added by gon...@rulezlan.org > Queue: PAR-Packer > Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #42731] pp Breaks @INC > Broken in: (no value) > Severity: (no value) > Owner: Nobody > Requestors: gon...@cpan.org > Status: rejected > Ticket <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=42731 > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 06:40:42PM -0500, Steffen Mueller via RT wrote: >> <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=42731 > >> >> Hi, >> > > Thank you Steffen for the long and answer. I still think it's a minor > bug since @INC content is not a scalar or nothing as people expect
Then this people better RTFM :) e.g. man perlvar wrt INC ... You can also insert hooks into the file inclusion system putting Perl code directly into @INC. Those hooks may be subroutine references, array references or blessed objects. See "require" in perlfunc for details. In fact, that's (mostly) the way PAR works: by putting a CODE ref into INC that will read modules from a zip (instead of reading from the filesystem). Cheers, Roderich
