On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 04:36:50PM +0100, Roderich Schupp wrote: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 3:53 AM, Gonéri Le Bouder via RT > <bug-par-pac...@rt.cpan.org> wrote: > > Fri Jan 23 21:53:57 2009: Request 42731 was acted upon. > > Transaction: Correspondence added by gon...@rulezlan.org > > Queue: PAR-Packer > > Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #42731] pp Breaks @INC > > Broken in: (no value) > > Severity: (no value) > > Owner: Nobody > > Requestors: gon...@cpan.org > > Status: rejected > > Ticket <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=42731 > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 06:40:42PM -0500, Steffen Mueller via RT wrote: > >> <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=42731 > > >> > >> Hi, > >> > > > > Thank you Steffen for the long and answer. I still think it's a minor > > bug since @INC content is not a scalar or nothing as people expect > > Then this people better RTFM :) e.g. man perlvar wrt INC > > ... > You can also insert hooks into the file inclusion system > putting Perl code directly into @INC. Those hooks may be > subroutine references, array references or blessed objects. > See "require" in perlfunc for details. > > In fact, that's (mostly) the way PAR works: by putting a CODE ref into INC > that will read modules from a zip (instead of reading from the filesystem). Indeed, I didn't know it was possible. Sorry for that.
Best regards,
Gonéri
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
