Fri Jul 17 05:25:23 2015: Request 102709 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by RSCHUPP
Queue: PAR-Packer
Subject: Unable to handle SIG interrupts
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner: Nobody
Requestors: gab...@gmail.com
Status: open
Ticket <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=102709 >
On 2015-07-17 04:57:08, ZDM wrote:
> Really, I don't understand, why you do not want to fix this? What are
> you waiting for?
Time to think this thru. You have not convinced me yet, see below.
And it's my time and my disgression how I spend it.
> Can you give an example, when parent process under windows should exit
> on CTRL+C without waiting for a child and do not perform standard
> cleanup operations and makes zombie from the child process?
What are you talking about, there are no zombies here.
> Another thing - if I use something like this:
> print 'Press ENTER to continue...';
> <STDIN>;
I managed to get hold of an old laptop running Windows XP and I can't reproduce
this here: If I Ctrl-C the above example at the prompt, both the parent
and the child get killed, so I don't see the point.
If the script has set up a SIGINT handler, it is executed. Yeah, the cleanup
in the parent isn't run in this case, but it isn't on *nix either.
Also, there's no harm in leaving some temp files around.
> This is a typical software bug, and I watched him since using parl
> under windows. This bug is not critical, but makes software behavior
> unexpected.
Nope, _ignoring_ SIGINT is unexpected behaviour.
Cheers, Roderich
