> Thanks for your response. I guess I was talking about visualization. Would > Ensight be considered an industry standard?
As close as you will get to a standard. If you are in the CFD field, you may want to look into CGNS too. We will have CGNS support relatively soon. -berk On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:53 PM, j s <j.s4...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your response. I guess I was talking about visualization. Would > Ensight be considered an industry standard? > > Juan > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Berk Geveci <berk.gev...@kitware.com> > wrote: >> >> What do you mean by portable? Across visualization applications or >> across platforms? Across visualization applications, you best bet is >> probably EnSight. >> >> -berk >> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:56 PM, j s <j.s4...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I was wondering what everyone would consider to be the most portable >> > format >> > for: >> > >> > 1. multi-zone >> > 2. unstructured >> > 3. 2d or 3d >> > >> > mesh data. >> > >> > Thanks Everyone, >> > >> > Juan >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > ParaView mailing list >> > ParaView@paraview.org >> > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ ParaView mailing list ParaView@paraview.org http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
