Please change the mailing list so the default "reply to" is the list and not the person who last responded.
I realized my mistake once it was already sent, but I didn't follow up to the list since I figured you'd reply to the list if you thought it warranted public attention. Juan On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Berk Geveci <berk.gev...@kitware.com>wrote: > Hi Juan, > > Please direct your questions to the ParaView mailing list instead of > me. I believe that we will have some sort of CGNS support in the next > release. It may take some time to mature though. > > -berk > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:45 PM, j s <j.s4...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am from the TCAD field, which is CFD related. Unfortunately it has > always > > been based on proprietary data formats. Thanks for pointing out CGNS. I > > had no idea paraview would be supporting it. What time frame were you > > expecting for CGNS support in your tool. > > > > Juan > > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Berk Geveci <berk.gev...@kitware.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> > Thanks for your response. I guess I was talking about visualization. > >> > Would > >> > Ensight be considered an industry standard? > >> > >> As close as you will get to a standard. If you are in the CFD field, > >> you may want to look into CGNS too. We will have CGNS support > >> relatively soon. > >> > >> -berk > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:53 PM, j s <j.s4...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Thanks for your response. I guess I was talking about visualization. > >> > Would > >> > Ensight be considered an industry standard? > >> > > >> > Juan > >> > > >> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Berk Geveci <berk.gev...@kitware.com > > > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> What do you mean by portable? Across visualization applications or > >> >> across platforms? Across visualization applications, you best bet is > >> >> probably EnSight. > >> >> > >> >> -berk > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:56 PM, j s <j.s4...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > Hello, > >> >> > > >> >> > I was wondering what everyone would consider to be the most > portable > >> >> > format > >> >> > for: > >> >> > > >> >> > 1. multi-zone > >> >> > 2. unstructured > >> >> > 3. 2d or 3d > >> >> > > >> >> > mesh data. > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks Everyone, > >> >> > > >> >> > Juan > >> >> > > >> >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> > ParaView mailing list > >> >> > ParaView@paraview.org > >> >> > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ ParaView mailing list ParaView@paraview.org http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview