Is this a job for TableExtentTranslator in the reader or adapter? David E DeMarle Kitware, Inc. R&D Engineer 28 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662 Phone: 518-371-3971 x109
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Moreland, Kenneth <kmo...@sandia.gov> wrote: > Actually, I think there is an issue with structured extents. The problem > with structured extents is that ParaView/VTK will ask for a particular > extent on each process, and these extents are not likely to match up with > what is actually available on that process. It situation is stupid because > the extents are picked arbitrarily, and everyone would be happy with the > extents available from the FORTRAN code, but there is no way for the > CoProcessing library to force the pipeline to accept certain extents. > > The only way around the problem right now that I know of is to place the > data in a multiblock structure like AMR. > > -Ken > > > On 7/28/10 9:59 AM, "Andy Bauer" <andy.ba...@kitware.com> wrote: > > Hi John, > > I'd like to think it works but as I haven't tested it to do that I'm not > going to promise that it works :) It uses a TrivialProducer to insert the > data set/composite data set into the pipeline with the idea that > coprocessing should essentially execute almost exactly the same as any > corresponding paraview python script for pvbatch. > > Since you're asking about it though I'll try to look at it this week and get > back to you. If you get to it sooner than I do and find a bug then I'd also > be more than happy to try and fix it. > > Andy > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Biddiscombe, John A. <biddi...@cscs.ch> > wrote: > > I’m experimenting with the coProcessing library. It’s very nice. Well done > you guys. > > Question : I have a Fortran code generating a slab of data (volume, actually > a rectilinear grid, but for now I’ll be happy with a volume). > > I can send the data into the adaptor and generate datasets, all is well. On > a single process all seems to be normal, but before I start on lots of cores > ..... > > The data is divided among processes such that I need to worry about whole > extents, and piece extents. > > Can I export individual image data (rectilinear grid) pieces from each > process, set the extent locally and let the usual paraview pipeline handle > it. Normally (in a reader) I’d be getting piece numbers and all that and I’m > not sure if this will be transparent or not. > > The Phasta (I think) example, uses a multiblcok structure, which I’d prefer > to avoid. a Multipiece dataset is fine...is there a volume example anywhere? > > Thanks > > JB > > > > **** Kenneth Moreland > *** Sandia National Laboratories > *********** > *** *** *** email: kmo...@sandia.gov > ** *** ** phone: (505) 844-8919 > *** web: http://www.cs.unm.edu/~kmorel > > > _______________________________________________ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview > > _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview