Thanks for the info Leo, I am, however, having trouble building the source that I've downloaded.
Could you point me to any instructions on how to build? http://paraview.org/Wiki/index.php?title=ParaView:Build_And_Install&oldid=46445#On_Unix-like_operating_systems_2doesn't seem to tie up with the files I get. These are the files I've pulled from Git: -rw-r--r-- 1 joe.borg root 364 Oct 23 09:43 ParaViewConfigVersion.cmake.in -rw-r--r-- 1 joe.borg root 2.6K Oct 23 09:43 ParaViewConfig.cmake.in -rw-r--r-- 1 joe.borg root 15K Oct 23 09:43 License_v1.2.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 joe.borg root 583 Oct 23 09:43 DartConfig.cmake -rw-r--r-- 1 joe.borg root 539 Oct 23 09:43 CTestConfig.cmake -rw-r--r-- 1 joe.borg root 24K Oct 23 09:43 CMakeLists.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 joe.borg root 3.2K Oct 23 09:43 vtkPVConfig.h.in -rw-r--r-- 1 joe.borg root 5.0K Oct 23 09:43 cave.pvx drwxr-xr-x 5 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 09:54 Examples/ drwxr-xr-x 26 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 09:55 Plugins/ drwxr-xr-x 13 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 09:56 Utilities/ drwxr-xr-x 2 joe.borg root 12K Oct 23 09:56 CMake/ drwxr-xr-x 11 joe.borg root 12K Oct 23 09:56 SuperBuild/ drwxr-xr-x 5 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 09:56 CoProcessing/ drwxr-xr-x 2 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 09:56 CommandLineExecutables/ drwxr-xr-x 4 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 09:56 Wrapping/ drwxr-xr-x 3 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 09:56 Common/ drwxr-xr-x 7 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 09:57 Qt/ drwxr-xr-x 24 joe.borg root 8.0K Oct 23 10:01 VTK/ drwxr-xr-x 5 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 10:01 ThirdParty/ drwxr-xr-x 9 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 10:02 ParaViewCore/ drwxr-xr-x 3 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 10:02 Applications/ Thanks. Regards, Joseph David Borġ http://www.jdborg.com On 19 October 2012 21:43, Yuanxin Liu <leo....@kitware.com> wrote: > Hi, Joe, > Berk reminded me that Andy Bauer has put in some fixes for gradient > interpolation for pyramids (5a7dc931c54d868). Since your data contain > pyramids, this is quite likely the fix for this bug. > Leo > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Yuanxin Liu <leo....@kitware.com> wrote: > >> Hi, Joe, >> It looks like this was indeed a bug in 3.14.1 but the bug has been >> fixed in the current development branch. I am not entirely sure which >> commit explicitly did it. >> >> Leo >> >> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Joe Borġ <m...@jdborg.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am using 3.14.1 64-bit on a single core (if I enable multi-core, it >>> becomes very unstable). >>> >>> Adding tets to this small case works, but I've got a bigger duct with a >>> more refined mesh and adding tets don't fix the problem (make it better >>> though). >>> >>> See attached PVSM. >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Joseph David Borġ >>> http://www.jdborg.com >>> >>> >>> On 18 October 2012 19:00, Yuanxin Liu <leo....@kitware.com> wrote: >>> >>>> No, I did not use Tetrahedralize. >>>> >>>> Are you using the lastest development version? Are you running >>>> paraview as a single process? >>>> >>>> Do you mind saving a state file of your session and post it? >>>> >>>> thanks! >>>> >>>> Leo >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Joe Borġ <m...@jdborg.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Leo, >>>>> >>>>> You don't seem to have used the Tetrahedralise filter? How have you >>>>> got this to work without that? >>>>> >>>>> Mine works fine after setting the fluid as input and source as the >>>>> inlet, but I must first use the Tetrahedralise filter. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Joseph David Borġ >>>>> http://www.jdborg.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 17 October 2012 18:14, Yuanxin Liu <leo....@kitware.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Joe, >>>>>> >>>>>> I am not seeing exactly what you are seeing. In the attached image >>>>>> produced with the current master, I created a stream tracer with outlet >>>>>> block as the seeds and the fluid block as the input, and the streamlines >>>>>> seem right. >>>>>> >>>>>> But I think there is a bug in how the stream tracer handles >>>>>> multiblock data, because if I change the stream tracer input to the whole >>>>>> pipe data set, instead of just the fluid block, some stream lines go >>>>>> straight to the void like you described. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you try setting up the pipeline as I did using ExtractBlock and >>>>>> compare with my image? >>>>>> >>>>>> Leo >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Magician <f_magic...@mac.com>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Joe, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Tetrahedralize" filter is applicable. >>>>>>> All cells are splitted into Tetrahedral ones. >>>>>>> Try it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Magician >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2012/10/17, at 23:40, Joe Borġ wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Thanks Magician, >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Thanks for testing. What are you using to convert to tet? Is it >>>>>>> a ParaView feature? >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Leo, can the priority of the bug be raised please? >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Regards, >>>>>>> > Joseph David Borġ >>>>>>> > http://www.jdborg.com >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On 17 October 2012 14:20, Magician <f_magic...@mac.com> wrote: >>>>>>> > Hi Joseph, >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I tried your data and got a result as yours. >>>>>>> > Your data only includes Hex, Wedge, Tet and Pyramid, >>>>>>> > but streamlines are stopped earlier. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Same as my polyhedral pipe sample, I applied Tetrahedralize filter >>>>>>> > to your pipe source, and I could get valid streamlines. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Magician >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > Pipe.tar.gz attached to the bug report below, in the form of an >>>>>>> Ensight >>>>>>> > > Case. First extract the archive and to open in Paraview, use >>>>>>> "All files >>>>>>> > > (*)" when browsing and select the .encas, then select "EnSight >>>>>>> Files". >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > Regards, >>>>>>> > > Joseph David Borġ >>>>>>> > > http://www.jdborg.com >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > On 12 October 2012 03:28, Yuanxin Liu <leo.liu at kitware.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > > Hi, >>>>>>> > > > Is it possible for you to upload the data? By the way, if >>>>>>> the cell >>>>>>> > > > type is polyhedron, then this is quite likely the same bug as >>>>>>> this: >>>>>>> > > > http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=13442 >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > Leo >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Joe Borġ <mail at jdborg.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > >> Hi guys, >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> I've got an odd issue with the stream trace and stream trace >>>>>>> custom >>>>>>> > > >> source filters in Paraview (3.14.1 64bit). No matter what >>>>>>> settings I use, >>>>>>> > > >> the traces die off very soon and some even carry on straight >>>>>>> (even when >>>>>>> > > >> there's no fluid). >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> See the two screenshots I've got from Paraview. >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> http://jdborg.com/images/paraview/pv_inlet.png >>>>>>> > > >> http://jdborg.com/images/paraview/pv_outlet.png >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> Not sure if this is a setting that's easy to miss or if it's >>>>>>> more >>>>>>> > > >> terminal. >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> Thanks, >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> Regards, >>>>>>> > > >> Joseph David Borġ >>>>>>> > > >> http://www.jdborg.com >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview