You could test it with the nighly builds from the dashboard. That way you don't have to compile anything.
You can find more information here: http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView_Nightly_Binaries -Armin On Tue Mar 17 12:27:27 2015 GMT+0200, Masaaki SHOJIMA wrote: > Hi, Michael, > > I found a web-page regarding the CGNS reader, in which you are making > important comments. > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.science.paraview.user/23957 > > I have to wait for the next version, is it right? > > Thanks > > Masaaki > > 2015-03-17 16:02 GMT+09:00 Mickael Philit <mickey....@gmail.com>: > > > Hello, > > > > sorry to intrude, > > I think the problem may come from the CGNS loader of ParaView. > > When using the CGNS plugin from ParaView development version, you get the > > same picture as Ensight. > > My two cents > > > > Mickael > > > > > > On 17/03/2015 05:04, Masaaki SHOJIMA wrote: > > > > Hi Berk, > > > > I appreciate your kindness > > > > Here, I attaches the data. > > Compare Gradient.pdf (252KB) > > > > A calculated field by SC/Tetra solver is uploaded in Dropbox. (Calc.zip) > > Please download the data. It contains FLD format for SC/Tetra post and > > CGNS format for Ensight and Paraview. > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/5fpeu1qwhyzjn5u/Calc.zip?dl=0 > > > > (1) I calculated the flow and the pressure in a simple cylinder for a test > > ( diameter 0.005m, length 0.01m). Plug flow at inlet with 0.03 m/s. > > > > (2) Data were transfered to Ensight and Paraview in CGNS format. > > > > (3) Pressure was mapped on the surface and compared between SC/Tetra post, > > Ensight and Paraview. All application provided same results. > > > > (4) Gradient (pressure) was calculated in each post and z-component of > > Gradient (pressure) was visualized with same colored contour. Only paraview > > provided a different image because the computed gradients in paraview had > > half values compared to SC/Tetra post and Ensight. > > > > (5) Gradient (velocity-X) was also calculated in each post and the > > X-component of Grad (velocity-X) was visualized. Same results as shown in 4. > > > > > > Thanks a lot. > > > > Masaaki > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Powered by www.kitware.com > > > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > > > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView > > > > Follow this link to > > subscribe/unsubscribe:http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview > > > > > > > -- Sent from my Jolla _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview