I should only need one that demonstrates the problem. On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:54 AM, sinan shabib <sinan_sha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi Andy, > > Could you please tell me, which data set you need ? > Because it´s big data. > I´m doing (Ensight 6) format. > > Greetings. > > > Andy Bauer <andy.ba...@kitware.com> schrieb am 17:42 Donnerstag, > 2.Februar 2017: > > > Hi, > > Can you share a data set that you are having an issue with? > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:12 AM, sinan shabib <sinan_sha...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > I apologize,I didn´t explain it well. > > I´m using: *Paraview 5.2.0-RC1 , 64 bit.* > > All fields data are being read but not visualized, that is, I get only one > color when I color the data with a specific field. > However, when I use "find data" function, I can see the data. > This happens only with: velocity & pressure. > I´m working on several configurations & the same thing happens with all of > them. > > Is it a bug or VTK has been corrupted or something else ? > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > Andy Bauer <andy.ba...@kitware.com> schrieb am 16:00 Donnerstag, > 2.Februar 2017: > > > Maybe I didn't understand what you were trying to do. Can you be a bit > more specific? > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:46 AM, sinan shabib <sinan_sha...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > Thanks for your reply. > > I think you've mixed my question up with someone else´s. > I still have the problem with data-visualization (data are read but not > visualized). > > > > Andy Bauer <andy.ba...@kitware.com> schrieb am 19:02 Dienstag, 31.Januar > 2017: > > > Hi, > > Please keep the discussion on the mailing list so that anyone can > participate (also, stuff gets lost in my Inbox too). > > The ParaView Catalyst Users Guide at http://www.paraview.org/files/ > catalyst/docs/ ParaViewCatalystUsersGuide_v2. pdf > <http://www.paraview.org/files/catalyst/docs/ParaViewCatalystUsersGuide_v2.pdf> > has information on how to use the Live functionality. It's in Section 2.3. > > Best, > Andy > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Kohlhase, Simon <simon.kohlh...@tum.de> > wrote: > > Hi, > > thanks a lot for the quick respons. > At least now we know that there’s no point to keep on trying. > > I’ll try to build and install it myself then. > > Is there any previous thread where I can find out more about the > simulation + catalyst linking to a parallel server? > > Best regards, > Simon > > *From:* Andy Bauer [mailto:andy.ba...@kitware.com ] > *Sent:* Donnerstag, 26. Januar 2017 16:22 > *To:* Kohlhase, Simon <simon.kohlh...@tum.de> > *Cc:* paraview@paraview.org; felix.henner...@gmail.com; Damerow, David < > david.dame...@tum.de> > *Subject:* Re: [Paraview] Paraview Live Visualisation C++ Pipeline > > Hi, > Currently the Live functionality only works when ParaView is built with > Python bindings. My suggestion would be to build ParaView yourself. That > should be much easier than trying to put in a C++ pipeline that can deal > with the Live functionality properly. > As for building ParaView, you may want to look into using the ParaView > Superbuild (https://gitlab.kitware.com/ paraview/paraview-superbuild/ > <https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview-superbuild/>) which will > also build all needed dependencies. The dependencies are probably all there > though since you've said that ParaView is already installed there. > I'm not sure the set up you're looking for but if you want to run with the > simulation+Catalyst linking to a parallel pvserver on the cluster which > then connects to a client, you may want to use ParaView master. The reason > for this is that there was a bug that had all of the simulation+Catalyst > nodes only being able to communicate with a single pvserver node (multiple > pvserver processes though). If you only want to connect the > simulation+Catalyst to the GUI client or pvserver processes on a single > node then 5.2 should work fine for you. > Best, > Andy > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Kohlhase, Simon <simon.kohlh...@tum.de> > wrote: > > Hi, > > for a University Project we’re trying to run Paraview Live Simulation on > the local cluster-network. Unfortunately the network only has a Paraview > version without python-binding installed, therefore we would like to run > the LiveSimulation with a C++-coded Pipeline Skript. > > As far as we understood, to make it work we have to rewrite the following > lines from the PythonPipeline Script to C++, which turns out to be quite > challenging: > > coprocessor.UpdateProducers( datadescription) > # Write output data, if appropriate. > coprocessor.WriteData( datadescription); > # Live Visualization, if enabled. > coprocessor. DoLiveVisualization( datadescription, "localhost", 22222) > > We tried the following: > > //INITIALIZE > vtkNew<vtkLiveInsituLink> link; > vtkSMProxyManager* proxyManager; > vtkSMSessionProxyManager* sessionProxyManager; > link -> SetInsituPort(22222); > link -> SetHostname("localhost"); > proxyManager = vtkSMProxyManager:: GetProxyManager(); > sessionProxyManager = proxyManager-> GetActiveSessionProxyManager() ; > link -> Initialize( sessionProxyManager); > > // Initialize returns 1, therefore connection established properly > > //Then we tried to coprocess with the following code: > vtkNew<vtkXMLPImageDataWriter> writer; > writer->SetInputConnection( producer->GetOutputPort()); > vtkSMProxy* proxy = sessionProxyManager->NewProxy( > "insitu_writer_parameters"," XMLPImageDataWriter"); > vtkSMInputProperty* property = (vtkSMInputProperty*) proxy -> > GetProperty("Input"); > > //set input of proxy to our writer or datadescription – DOESN’T WORK > while(true){ > link->InsituUpdate( dataDescription->GetTime(), > dataDescription->GetTimeStep() ); > //update pipeline > link->InsituPostProcess( dataDescription->GetTime(), > dataDescription->GetTimeStep() ); > if(link->GetSimulationPaused() ){ > if(link->WaitForLiveChange()){ > break; > } > } else{ > break; > } > } > > So how are we supposed to get the data from our simulation into the Proxy? > We have been trying and searching the documentation for the right > functions, but we can’t figure out how to do it. > > We would really appreciate some help ;-) > > Best regards, > Simon Kohlhase > > ______________________________ _________________ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/ > opensource/opensource.html > <http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html> > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ > ParaView <http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView> > > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q= ParaView > <http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView> > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://public.kitware.com/ mailman/listinfo/paraview > <http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview> > > > > > > ______________________________ _________________ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/ > opensource/opensource.html > <http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html> > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ > ParaView <http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView> > > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q= ParaView > <http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView> > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://public.kitware.com/ mailman/listinfo/paraview > <http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview> > > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview