Selon Jim Meyering <[email protected]>: > Otavio Salvador wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Jim Meyering <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes, definitely. > >> The reasons for removing functionality from the UI > >> (code is dangerously buggy) apply equally well to the API. > >> Actually removing the code will involve more work up front, > >> but will be better in the long run. > > > > Fully agree the the code removal. It will also make our life easier > > in future since we'll stop to receive fs-related bugs :-) > > Thanks for the feedback. > FYI, here are the UI commands that I'm in the process of removing: > > mkpartfs > mkfs > check > cp > move > resize > > So far, it's looking surprisingly easy. > You would need too to remove the optional fs part in mkpart. Actually when you compile parted-1.9.0 without fs support, that's a bit disturbing to have the fs-type part described as optional when in fact, that's not supported at all.
Gilles _______________________________________________ parted-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
