Curtis Gedak wrote: ... > I think it is a good idea to keep the resize FAT16/32 file system code > in parted for at least a while longer (perhaps even up to a year or > more). That way it will provide some overlap time between when the > fatresize project contains the updated code from parted, and when > dosfstools might include the fatresize command. This will also > provide various distributions time to include such code in the > respective updated packages.
I am now considering taking a less invasive approach for the upcoming beta release: merely warn about any use of file-system-related operations. Removing FS support entirely would take more time than I have now, and would significantly complicate testing. In addition, hfs/hfs+ resizing support must stay, since there appears to be no free alternative. _______________________________________________ parted-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
