We are using v8.8 SP4 and are planning on upgrading next year. As far as tips 
or tricks it depends on what you are looking to do. I like the LANDesk 
community, it has answers for most of my questions. LANDesk also has a 
quarterly user group that can be valuable to meet other LANDesk users. They 
also have a small training session and from time to time will bring users to 
talk about how they used LANDesk on their jobs. Feel free to contact me 
directly with any questions. 

[email protected]

Thanks,
Victor 

On Jan 27, 2011, at 10:56 PM, Leslie <[email protected]> wrote:

> Do you have any tips or tricks for using LANDesk?  Do you use the current 
> version 9.0 SP2?
> 
> Leslie
> 
>  
> 
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Victor Anaya
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 9:09 PM
> To: PaulDotCom Security Weekly Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Pauldotcom] Favorite Third Party Enterprise Patching Server?
> 
>  
> 
> We've been using LANDesk for about 8 years now and we love it. At the 
> beginning we had major issues with the database and other deployment issues, 
> but now we know that most of our deployment problems were due to lack of 
> product knowledge. As we learned the product and acquired more experience 
> with the product, we were able to take advantage of its advanced features 
> like "custom vulnerabilities".
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Victor A.
> 
>  
> 
> From: Bugbear <[email protected]>
> To: PaulDotCom Security Weekly Mailing List <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tue, January 25, 2011 2:47:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pauldotcom] Favorite Third Party Enterprise Patching Server?
> 
> LANDesk < Unfortunately yes
> 
> Have had some major issues with it. Type of issues where you reinstalling 
> agent and rebooting 100's of PC's
> 
> When it works it works great, problem is every service pack seems to break as 
> much as it fixes. Not what they use to be, but the company has changed hands 
> a couple of times over the past few years.
> 
> Just my 2 cents
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Craig Freyman <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Anyone use LANDesk Patch Manager?
> 
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Jeremy Pommerening <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> I'm using BigFix after trying Lumension and hating it.  BigFix rocks!  At 
> least for the moment.  IBM swallowed them up so expect that it will get worse 
> but for now it's fantastic.  You can use BES Relays for the slow links 
> basically designating a workstation at each site as the patching server for a 
> group of computers.
> 
> Jeremy Pommerening
> CISSP,GCFA,GPEN,GAWN,GCFW,
> MCSE Win2K, MCSE NT4
> 
> --- On Mon, 1/24/11, Steven Sumichrast <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> From: Steven Sumichrast <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Pauldotcom] Favorite Third Party Enterprise Patching Server?
> To: "PaulDotCom Security Weekly Mailing List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, January 24, 2011, 12:46 PM
> 
>  
> 
> We are using Lumension PatchLink for Linux/Windows.  I've only had to
> deal with it now for a few months, but I think the general consensus
> is we're not too thrilled with it (from a compliance standpoint).  It
> does an ok job, but we think there are probably better solutions out
> there.
> 
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Jack Daniel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I was always a big fan of Shavlik, but it depends on your environment.
> >  Shavlik does a great job on the Windows side, but I don't think they
> > have moved into other platforms.  They do support a huge number of
> > third party apps, and they have a 14 day (I think) trial so you can
> > play with it.
> >
> > BigFix seems to be very popular with larger and more mixed
> > environments- but I've never used them myself.  Someone here must
> > have, though...
> >
> > Jack
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Craig Freyman <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> >> What is your favorite third party enterprise patching server? I'll need 
> >> some
> >> sort of distributed model because of slow WAN links and multiple locations.
> >> I'm curious to see what you all use and why you like it.
> >> Thanks,
> >> Craig
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pauldotcom mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> >> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ______________________________________
> > Jack Daniel, Reluctant CISSP
> > http://twitter.com/jack_daniel
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/jackadaniel
> > http://blog.uncommonsensesecurity.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pauldotcom mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> > Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com

Reply via email to