Hi Gabor, Scott, and Raj, Has there been a comparison with the 3rd R & O as suggested earlier that affects the Draft and should be addressed now before we submit and discussion there of? I am not sure why things are so quiet, but it seems that would be a timely thing to do now.
Sincerely, Nancy On May 23, 2012, at 5:39 PM, <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote: > Sure. Adding (or putting back) a requirement on pre-configuration shouldn't > be a problem. We'll work out a requirement which all of us is going to be > happy with. > > In the meantime, I would like to ask more people to review the draft and send > comments to the list. As I mentioned in my previous mail, if you review the > draft and have no comments, send a note to the list that the draft is good as > it is, we need these notes as much as we need the actual comments. > > Thanks, Gabor > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ext Joel M. Halpern [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 10:17 AM > To: Bajko Gabor (Nokia-CIC/SiliconValley) > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [paws] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts > > I beg to differ slightly. > While preconfiguration is always possible, if we leave out the requirement to > support it, then we are likely to also leave such configuration capabilities > out of management models, etc. If it is "always possible" then including it > in the requirements seems inexpensive. > > Yours, > Joel > > On 5/17/2012 12:01 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> O.3 The master device MUST identify a database to which it will >> register, make channel requests, etc... The master device MAY >> >> select a database for service by discovery at runtime *or the master >> device MAY select a database for service by means of a* >> >> *pre-programmed URI address.* >> >> However in the requirements it seems that the ability to support the >> FCC model has been removed. Specifically: >> >> It appears that the data model requirements that supported hardcoded >> URI addresses for WSDBs have been removed >> >> <GB> pre-configuration is always possible. We don't need a separate >> requirement for it. >> > _______________________________________________ > paws mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws _______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
