Folks,

I issued the below 2nd wglc on 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-04.txt
and I only got one review with a comment which is easy to address.

We really need more reviews in order to be able to progress the draft. If you 
care about the use cases and requirements related to White Space Database 
Access, please read the draft and send your comments to the list. If you do not 
have comments, then send a note to the list that the draft is good as it is, we 
need these notes as much as we need the actual comments.

I cannot send the draft to the IESG without a minimum number of reviews. Ie, if 
we don't get reviews, we can't make progress.

Thanks, Gabor

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bajko 
Gabor (Nokia-CIC/SiliconValley)
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 5:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [paws] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts

Since there were quite a few changes made to the new version -04, let's have 
another WGLC for this document.

Therefore, I'd like to initiate a 2nd WG Last Call for comments on 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-04.txt

Please review the draft and send your comments to the list by June 1st, 2012.

If you review the draft and have no comments, send a note to the list that the 
draft is good as it is, we need these notes as much as we need the actual 
comments.

Thanks, Gabor


From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]]<mailto:[mailto:[email protected]]> On Behalf 
Of Probasco Scott (Nokia-CIC/Dallas)
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 11:51 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [paws] UC&R document

Hello All,

A new version of the Use Cases & Requirements draft has been uploaded. This 
version of the Internet Draft has addressed all of the issues raised during 
Working Group Last Call, including discussion from IETF #83, and is ready to be 
forwarded to IESG.

Kind Regards,
Raj & Scott

Draft:  
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-04.txt

Diff:   
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-04

Abstract:
   Portions of the radio spectrum that are assigned to a particular use
   but are unused or unoccupied at specific locations and times are
   defined as "white space".  The concept of allowing additional
   transmissions (which may or may not be licensed) in white space is a
   technique to &quot;unlock&quot; existing spectrum for new use.  An obvious
   requirement is that these additional transmissions do not interfere
   with the assigned use of the spectrum.  One approach to using the
   white space spectrum at a given time and location is to verify with a
   database for available channels.

   This document describes the concept of TV White Spaces.  It also
   describes the problems that need to be addressed to enable white
   space spectrum for additional uses, without causing interference to
   currently assigned use, by querying a database which stores
   information about the channel availability at any given location and
   time.  A number of possible use cases of white space spectrum and
   technology as well as a set of requirements for the database query
   protocol are also described.



_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws

Reply via email to