As one of the authors of the UC&R I-D, I declare that the I-D is in full conformance of BCP 78 and 79.
I have no IPRs associated with this I-D to disclose. -Raj On 8/29/12 4:59 PM, "Bajko Gabor (Nokia-CIC/SiliconValley)" <[email protected]> wrote: >Thanks to the editors for generating this new version of the draft. >I will now go ahead and prepare the document writeup and send it to the >iesg. >In the process of doing that, I have to ask each author and editor to >confirm that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full >conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have already been >filed. > >Thanks, Gabor > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >Patil Basavaraj (Nokia-CIC/Dallas) >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 9:21 AM >To: [email protected] >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: [paws] Request to submit UC&R I-D to IESG... > > >The discussion in the WG has shifted to the details about the PAWS >protocol. >The use case and requirements I-D has been updated to reflect the >comments at the WG meeting at IETF84 and on the mailing list. The I-D is >ready to be forwarded to the IESG for publication as an Informational RFC. > >We would like to request the chairs to submit the I-D to the IESG with >the pro to writeup. > >- Raj and Scott > >_______________________________________________ >paws mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws _______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
