Hello, I confirm that I have no IPR associated with this I-D to disclose and that this I-D is in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Kind Regards, Scott On Aug 30, 2012, at 11:30 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > As one of the authors of the UC&R I-D, I declare that the I-D is in full > conformance of BCP 78 and 79. > > I have no IPRs associated with this I-D to disclose. > > -Raj > > On 8/29/12 4:59 PM, "Bajko Gabor (Nokia-CIC/SiliconValley)" > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks to the editors for generating this new version of the draft. >> I will now go ahead and prepare the document writeup and send it to the >> iesg. >> In the process of doing that, I have to ask each author and editor to >> confirm that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full >> conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have already been >> filed. >> >> Thanks, Gabor >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Patil Basavaraj (Nokia-CIC/Dallas) >> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 9:21 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: [paws] Request to submit UC&R I-D to IESG... >> >> >> The discussion in the WG has shifted to the details about the PAWS >> protocol. >> The use case and requirements I-D has been updated to reflect the >> comments at the WG meeting at IETF84 and on the mailing list. The I-D is >> ready to be forwarded to the IESG for publication as an Informational RFC. >> >> We would like to request the chairs to submit the I-D to the IESG with >> the pro to writeup. >> >> - Raj and Scott >> >> _______________________________________________ >> paws mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws > > _______________________________________________ > paws mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws _______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
