On 10/31/12 4:20 PM, [email protected] wrote:

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/agenda/agenda-85-paws


I have a few issues with this, at least as the final agenda. That agenda says:

PAWS working group meeting - Atlanta (IETF85)
Thursday - November 8th @ 9am
=========================================

Administrivia (5 min)
Blue sheets, minutes taker, jabber

Note Well

Agenda bashing

Sure, the above is fine.

WG doc status (20 min)

No, this should not be done. We have all read the docs. If the status needs to be summarized, post a message to the mailing list. There is no need to waste time in the session doing this. Please, let's not have this on the agenda.

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-vchen-paws-protocol-00.txt (Vince, 60min)

This is fine, but I expect the author and the chairs to have a list of issues in the document that *can not* be resolved on the list. I do not have a problem with compiling that issues list week and not finalizing it until the day of (I understand that we all have busy schedules), but please try to collect these issues together on the mailing list so if people want to talk about any particular issues that are not otherwise noted, they will be able to identify them.

time permitting: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-wu-paws-secutity-00.txt (Yang, 20 min)

I have not seen serious discussion of this document on the list. What is the purpose of this agenda item?

Finally, the only feedback I got to my review of the usecases-rqmnts document was from Peter Stanforth, but haven't heard anything further. If folks aren't yet prepared to discuss this at the f2f, I will understand. (My review did come in quite late.) But if people do want to discuss it, you should post to the list so that the chairs know what you wish to discuss. (I don't expect this to be added to the agenda if there isn't more discussion on the list.)

pr

--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478

_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws

Reply via email to