HI Gabor, I do not understand when doing a global standard, and only referring to underserved areas, which is more common in developed countries, why use cases are left out for not only rural, but remote, which happens to involve many countries that can or do not relate to underserved, implying that some use is already there. The constant use of the term wifi, and no other technology or use cases left out seems to promote one technology over others. This is not agnostic in my view, it is if all other efforts done or in process globally are irrelevant. Combining use cases as was done is not in the best interests of the market, their choices of what to use, or a global effort in demographics, whether population, terrain, or different regs that apply or options that other countries can use to determine what is the best course for their sovereign nation.
Sorry to violently disagree, but even the device regs from the US are ignored as stated before. Nancy Begin forwarded message: > From: [email protected] > Subject: [paws] I-D Action: draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-09.txt > Date: December 21, 2012 9:10:51 AM PST > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Protocol to Access WS database Working Group > of the IETF. > > Title : Protocol to Access White Space (PAWS) Database: Use > Cases and Requirements > Author(s) : Anthony Mancuso > Basavaraj Patil > Filename : draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-09.txt > Pages : 27 > Date : 2012-12-21 > > Abstract: > [Editor's Note: This version is submitted for review. A final, post- > review version is anticipated that will supersede this version]. > > Portions of the radio spectrum that are assigned to a particular use > but are unused or unoccupied at specific locations and times are > defined as "white space." The concept of allowing additional > transmissions (which may or may not be licensed) in white space is a > technique to "unlock" existing spectrum for new use. An obvious > requirement is that these additional transmissions do not interfere > with the assigned use of the spectrum. One approach to using white > space spectrum at a given time and location is to verify spectrum > availability with a database that manages spectrum sharing and > provides spectrum-availability information. > > This document describes a number of possible use cases of white space > spectrum and technology as well as a set of requirements for the > database query protocol. The concept of white spaces is described > along with the problems that need to be addressed to enable white > space spectrum for additional uses without causing interference to > currently assigned use. Use of white space is enabled by querying a > database that stores information about spectrum availability at any > given location and time. > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-09 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-09 > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > paws mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
