Tony,
Thanks for the new version. At first glance, it looks like a good edit.
I'll do a thorough review once the WG confirms that this one is good to go.
Chairs, let me know when this has had enough review. I'd especially like
to hear from folks like Peter Stanforth and others who had concerns that
my suggestions might have removed too much from the document. Does this
version satisfy everyone?
Thanks for giving this a go, and a happy new year to everyone.
pr
On 12/21/12 12:39 PM, Anthony Mancuso wrote:
PAWS list members,
I just submitted a new version of the PAWS Use Cases & Requirements
doc for review and discussion.
The latest draft (v. 09):
* incorporates the suggestions contained in the post by Pete
Resnick, AD, which included, among other things, recommendation
to coordinate architecturally-and protocol-common use cases
* adds a new use case (local TV broadcast)
* Deleted security threat 5 and added language to security
considerations to match the protocol security considerations
that have evolved in the WG
* Clarified protocol normative requirement 6.3 to: "The protocol
MUST support determination of regulatory domain governing its
current location."
*
Cleaned up language and usage:
consistent use of primary, secondary users
changed "channel" availability references to "spectrum"
availability where appropriate
deleted references specific to TV band and generalized these to
radio spectrum
changed references to regulatory domain to rule set of
regulatory domain as appropriate to clarify that the latter
controls device behavior regardless of country (Brazil adopts US
"FccWhitespace2010" rule set)
cleaned up language and syntax throughout
Thanks for any feedback,
Tony Mancuso
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
