Will wait for Tony to generate a new version by addressing the received comments, before issuing the Last Call.
- Gabor From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ext Pete Resnick Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 2:59 PM To: Anthony Mancuso Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [paws] AD review of draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-10 Like I said, I'll await word from Brian and Gabor tomorrow for "go" or "no go" with the Last Call, even if there is no new draft ready to go. We can Last Call -10 if nobody thinks there's a strong reason to wait. I am fine with either path. pr On 1/23/13 4:54 PM, Anthony Mancuso wrote: I',m not sure I can turn around the doc by tomorrow since there are some technical points I need to collaborate on. On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Rosen, Brian <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I think if Tony can spin a rev before EOB tomorrow, we should do that, but I'm thinking that the current rev is good enough, and I'd prefer to get it into the Feb 7 telechat. I don't feel very strongly about that, but... Brian On Jan 23, 2013, at 5:10 PM, Pete Resnick <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: One hitch: If you make the call by EOB tomorrow, I can get the Last Call sent out, which means (assuming the LC goes well) I can get it on the IESG telechat Feb 7. If we have to wait two additional weeks until the Feb 14 telechat, it's not a huge deal, but we have to say "go" or "no go" to the Last Call by EOB tomorrow for me to sneak it on to the earlier telechat. pr On 1/23/13 4:04 PM, Anthony Mancuso wrote: Good suggestion Gabor. I will wait another day or so and then start on generating a new version in response to the comments and clarifications. On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:55 PM, <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: My suggestion would be, if Tony has the time and willingness, then generate a new version and try to address these comments, perhaps taking the clarifications from Peter (and any input from others if available until tomorrow) into consideration. Thanks, Gabor -- Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/><http://www.qualcomm.com/%7Epresnick/> Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478<tel:%2B1%20%28858%29651-4478> _______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws -- Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/><http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/> Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
