Brian,
> First of all, reliability, geographic diversity, capacity, etc are > usually done with common URLs. Witness www.google.com > Your example makes sense in this case, because www.google.com is a single corporate entity and it manages its own reliability, diversity, etc. In contrast, WSDBs are offered by different entities (sometimes competing). The equivalence you are asking for would be http://www.wsdb.com and be automatically routed to different implementations. I don't think that's what we had in mind. -vince
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
