Hi All,
I have found two typos.
At example "getSpectrum" JSON-RPC in 6.4.1. :
"id": "xxxxxx", --> Comma should be deleted.
At example "getSpectrumBatch" JSON-RPC in 6.5.1. :
"id": "xxxxxx", --> Comma should be deleted.
I have a comment about example "getSpectrum" JSON-RPC response in 6.4.2 and
6.5.2.
There are two spectrum information parameters for the same frequency range.
One is for bandwidth 6e6, and the other is for bandwidth 1e5.
But spectral density of 6e6 is different from that of 1e5 in the same frequency
range.
It will be more nice if the spectral density of the same frequency range is
same.
Or it will be also nice if frequency ranges are modified to be different from
each other.
Thank you.
BR,
Sungjin
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 2:18 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [paws] WGLC on http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-paws-protocol-06
All,
The Editor of the document posted a new version and indicated that all open
issues raised on the list were resolved, and that there are no more open issues
he is aware of.
Therefore, I'd like to issue a wg last call on the document. We need reviews
and feedback in order to be able to progress the document.
Please read through the draft and send any comments you may have to the list in
the next 2-3 weeks.
If you review the draft and have no comments, send a note to the list that the
draft is good as it is, we need these notes as much as we need the actual
comments.
Thanks, Gabor
_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
