Sungjin,

Sorry for the long delay (vacation). Answers inline.


On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:30 PM, 유성진 <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I have found two typos.
>
> At example "getSpectrum" JSON-RPC in 6.4.1. :
>         "id": "xxxxxx",     --> Comma should be deleted.
> At example "getSpectrumBatch" JSON-RPC in 6.5.1. :
>         "id": "xxxxxx",     --> Comma should be deleted.
>

Thanks!


>
>
> I have a comment about example "getSpectrum" JSON-RPC response in 6.4.2
> and 6.5.2.
> There are two spectrum information parameters  for the same frequency
> range.
> One is for bandwidth 6e6, and the other is for bandwidth 1e5.
> But spectral density of 6e6 is different from that of 1e5 in the same
> frequency range.
> It will be more nice if the spectral density of the same frequency range
> is same.
> Or it will be also nice if frequency ranges are modified to be different
> from each other.
>

This is intended to represent the permissible maximum power in which
"wide-band" and "narrow-band" operations are permitted.
The available frequencies do not change (hence, the same start/stop
frequencies), just the permissible power.

Does that make sense?

-vince



> Thank you.
>
> BR,
> Sungjin
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 2:18 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [paws] WGLC on
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-paws-protocol-06
>
>
> All,
>
> The Editor of the document posted a new version and indicated that all
> open issues raised on the list were resolved, and that there are no more
> open issues he is aware of.
> Therefore, I'd like to issue a wg last call on the document. We need
> reviews and feedback in order to be able to progress the document.
>
> Please read through the draft and send any comments you may have to the
> list in the next 2-3 weeks.
> If you review the draft and have no comments, send a note to the list that
> the draft is good as it is, we need these notes as much as we need the
> actual comments.
>
> Thanks, Gabor
> _______________________________________________
> paws mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
> _______________________________________________
> paws mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
>



-- 
-vince
_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws

Reply via email to