On 9 Oct 2013, at 19:45, Vincent Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems to me that having the extra "timeRange" and "frequencyRanges" would > still be useful extension to the -06 version in order to define the > "envelope" (in both time and frequencies) for the response. > > Example: > > ... > Are you OK with that? (The "spectrumSchedules" encoding is the same as in > -06).
I think so, so long as "timeRange" and "frequencyRanges" are optional. Ray _______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
