Can do. We’ll cover this at the end of the -protocol discussion. Brian
On Feb 26, 2014, at 6:22 PM, Gabor Bajko <[email protected]> wrote: > The need for this requirement should be discussed on the list; and if > agreed, it can be incorporated by the editor into a future draft > version. > I won't be there in London, but perhaps, if you or someone else could > propose text this week, Brian could add it to next week's agenda. > > - Gabor > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Cesar Gutierrez > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> >> >> There is a new version available of ETSI EN 301 598 (this is the standard >> that lays out the requirements for operation in Europe). Most of the changes >> relate to RF requirements, but there is also an additional information >> element that the database will have to communicate to the Master device. >> This element indicates whether simultaneous transmission over multiple >> channels must be restricted in power, and it can take the values of 0 and 1. >> >> >> >> EN 301 598 v1.0.9 can be found here: >> >> http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/301500_301599/301598/01.00.09_30/en_301598v010009v.pdf >> >> and the addition I am referring to is described in section 4.2.3.4 and in >> table 4. >> >> >> >> Is it still possible to incorporate this new information element to the PAWS >> specification? >> >> >> >> Thanks and regards, >> >> Cesar >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> ****************************************************************************************************************** >> For more information visit www.ofcom.org.uk >> >> This email (and any attachments) is confidential and intended for the use of >> the addressee only. >> >> If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the >> message and delete it from your system. >> >> This email has been scanned for viruses. However, you open any attachments >> at your own risk. >> >> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and >> do not represent the views or opinions of Ofcom unless expressly stated >> otherwise. >> ****************************************************************************************************************** >> >> _______________________________________________ >> paws mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws >> > > _______________________________________________ > paws mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws _______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
