Gabor, Brian,

I think that what we would be looking for is a new parameter added to the 
SpectrumSpec element.

I suggest the following:

Parameter name: etsiEnSimultaneousChannelOperationRestriction
Parameter usage location: SpectrumSpec (Section 5.9)
Specification document: Specifies the constraint on the device maximum total 
EIRP, as defined by the ETSI Harmonised Standard  [ETSI-EN-301-598].  The 
values are represented by numeric strings,  such as "0", "1", etc.  Consult the 
documentation for the specification of the power constrain corresponding to 
each parameter value.


It would be great if we could consider this at the WG meeting tomorrow.

Thanks and regards,
Cesar


-----Original Message-----
From: Rosen, Brian [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 27 February 2014 15:51
To: Gabor Bajko
Cc: Cesar Gutierrez; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [paws] Revised ETSI standard

Can do.  We'll cover this at the end of the -protocol discussion.

Brian

On Feb 26, 2014, at 6:22 PM, Gabor Bajko <[email protected]> wrote:

> The need for this requirement should be discussed on the list; and if
> agreed, it can be incorporated by the editor into a future draft
> version.
> I won't be there in London, but perhaps, if you or someone else could
> propose text this week, Brian could add it to next week's agenda.
>
> - Gabor
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Cesar Gutierrez
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>>
>>
>> There is a new version available of ETSI EN 301 598 (this is the
>> standard that lays out the requirements for operation in Europe).
>> Most of the changes relate to RF requirements, but there is also an
>> additional information element that the database will have to communicate to 
>> the Master device.
>> This element indicates whether simultaneous transmission over
>> multiple channels must be restricted in power, and it can take the values of 
>> 0 and 1.
>>
>>
>>
>> EN 301 598 v1.0.9 can be found here:
>>
>> http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/301500_301599/301598/01.00.09_30/
>> en_301598v010009v.pdf
>>
>> and the addition I am referring to is described in section 4.2.3.4
>> and in table 4.
>>
>>
>>
>> Is it still possible to incorporate this new information element to
>> the PAWS specification?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks and regards,
>>
>> Cesar
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> *********************************************************************
>> *********************************************
>> For more information visit www.ofcom.org.uk
>>
>> This email (and any attachments) is confidential and intended for the
>> use of the addressee only.
>>
>> If you have received this email in error please notify the originator
>> of the message and delete it from your system.
>>
>> This email has been scanned for viruses. However, you open any
>> attachments at your own risk.
>>
>> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
>> sender and do not represent the views or opinions of Ofcom unless
>> expressly stated otherwise.
>> *********************************************************************
>> *********************************************
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> paws mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> paws mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws


________________________________

******************************************************************************************************************
For more information visit www.ofcom.org.uk

This email (and any attachments) is confidential and intended for the use of 
the addressee only.

If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the 
message and delete it from your system.

This email has been scanned for viruses. However, you open any attachments at 
your own risk.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and do 
not represent the views or opinions of Ofcom unless expressly stated otherwise.
******************************************************************************************************************

_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws

Reply via email to