Robert, Thanks for the review.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Robert Sparks <[email protected]> wrote: > This all looks very good to me. > > I've reviewed the diff between 12 and 14, and read through 14. > Thanks for the very nice work on simplifying section 6, Vincent! > > This isn't worth holding the document up in any way, but as it's going > through the rest of it's processing > consider, in 6.1, saying that the id should be generated uniquely enough > to allow the use of JSON-RPC batch? > Hmmm...I'm now not sure we should support JSON-RPC batching, since batching is built into some of the PAWS methods: - AVAIL_SPECTRUM_BATCH_REQ - DEV_VALID_REQ It might get confusing to support two different mechanisms. > > RjS > > > > On 7/31/14, 2:33 PM, Pete Resnick wrote: > >> On 7/31/14 2:31 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: >> >>> Given that I want to update the IANA language some more, I have another >>>> draft ready to upload (incorporating these changes). Should I do that >>>> now? >>>> >>> I think you should, unless Pete has other ideas for some reason. As I >>> always say: revisions are cheap. >>> >> >> Yeah, please go right ahead. Once I hear from Robert, I will likely send >> this out for a second Last Call, given the extent of the changes, so having >> the latest-and-greatest in there would be good. >> >> pr >> >> > -- -vince
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
