Wow! We never received notification of that 3rd IPR disclosure and I
therefore totally missed it. The fact is that it appears to be on the
as-yet-undefined and perhaps never-to-be-finished discovery part of the
protocol, so the WG may not care. But the WG must be consulted. Good
catch! Don't know how I missed it in my final check.
(I'll independently check with the secretariat about how we missed the
announcement.)
pr
On 8/20/14 11:52 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
= Shepherd write-up =
"Yes, there were 2 IPR disclosures filed that reference this document.
They were discussed in the WG, and nobody came forward to say that they'd
like to change anything in the document because of the disclosures."
But there are 3 IPR disclosures in the tracker, not 2. Were all three
discussed in the WG?
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
