On 8/21/14 2:59 AM, Vincent Chen wrote:
= Section 4.5 =
These two sentences seem to contradict each other:
"The device identifier, capabilities, and characteristics
communicated in the AVAIL_SPECTRUM_REQ message MUST be those of the
Slave Device, but the location MUST be that of the Master Device."
Ouch! I'll fix that. "... location MUST be that of the Slave Device."
Do we have any idea how that got in there in the first place? That seems
like it was a conscious decision, and I want to make sure we're not
missing something.
pr
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
